A brief historical introduction places the view in its historical context. This is followed by a section discussing some philosophical assumptions and implications of open theism, and the essay concludes with various theological topics. We discuss both the differences between open theism and other theological positions, and some matters of disagreement among open theists.
The basics of open theism and how Hasker came to believe it.
Argues that freewill is logically incompatible with God being timeless
Examines how evil is understood in these two models,
Response to Fredoso about the nature of divine transcendence.
If the divine mind changes then God cannot have exhaustive definite foreknowledge
The authors of the Openness of God respond to the comments about open theism by Grunler in Christianity Today.
Embracing ProdigalsJanuary 6, 2022 - 8:04 pm
Theology in the FleshMay 20, 2016 - 1:29 am
The God Who Risks: A Theology of Divine ProvidenceMarch 14, 2016 - 7:35 pm
No Other Name: An Investigation into the Destiny of the UnevangelizedMarch 13, 2016 - 7:29 pm
What About Those Who Have Never Heard?March 12, 2016 - 5:25 pm